Tag Archives: National Security

Obama Takes Aim at Bush and McCain With a Forceful Call to Change America

From The New York Times

DENVER — Barack Obama accepted the Democratic Party presidential nomination on Thursday, declaring that the “American promise has been threatened” by eight years under President Bush and that John McCain represented a continuation of policies that undermined the nation’s economy and imperiled its standing around the world.

The speech by Senator Obama, in front of an audience of nearly 80,000 people on a warm night in a football stadium refashioned into a vast political stage for television viewers, left little doubt how he intended to press his campaign against Mr. McCain this fall.

In cutting language, and to cheers that echoed across the stadium, he linked Mr. McCain to what he described as the “failed presidency of George W. Bush” and — reflecting what has been a central theme of his campaign since he entered the race — “the broken politics in Washington.”

“America, we are better than these last eight years,” he said. “We are a better country than this.”

But Mr. Obama went beyond attacking Mr. McCain by linking him to Mr. Bush and his policies. In the course of a 42-minute speech that ended with a booming display of fireworks and a shower of confetti, he offered searing and far-reaching attacks on his presumptive Republican opponent, repeatedly portraying him as the face of the old way of politics and failed Republican policies.

He said Mr. McCain was out of touch with the problems of everyday Americans. “It’s not because John McCain doesn’t care,” he said. “It’s because John McCain doesn’t get it.”

And he went so far as to attack the presumed strength of Mr. McCain’s campaign, national security. “You know, John McCain likes to say that he’ll follow bin Laden to the gates of hell, but he won’t even follow him to the cave where he lives,” he said.

The speech loomed as arguably Mr. Obama’s most important of the campaign to date. It was an opportunity to present himself to Americans just now beginning to tune in on this campaign, to make the case against Mr. McCain and to offer what many Democrats say he has failed to offer to date: an idea of what he stands for, beyond a promise of change.

To that end, he emphasized what he described as concrete steps he would take to address the anxieties of working-class Americans, promising tax cuts for the middle class and pledging to wean the country from dependence on Middle East oil within 10 years to address high fuel prices.

With the speech, Mr. Obama closed out his party’s convention here and prepared for a quick shift of public attention to the Republicans as Mr. McCain moved to name his running mate and his party got ready for its convention in St. Paul on Monday.

He delivered it in a most unconventional setting, becoming the third nominee of a major party in the nation’s history to leave the site of his convention to give his acceptance speech at a stadium. In this case, it was Invesco Field, set against the Rockies and about a mile from the arena where he had been nominated the night before. His aides chose the stadium to signal a break from typical politics and to permit thousands of his supporters from across the country to hear him speak.

And it came on a night that offered — by the coincidence of scheduling — a reminder of the historic nature of the Obama candidacy: 45 years to the day after the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his “I Have a Dream” speech on the Mall in Washington. Mr. Obama is the first African-American to be nominated for the White House by a major party, a fact that, for all its significance, has been barely mentioned over the course of this four-day gathering.

Even in invoking the anniversary of the King speech, Mr. Obama only alluded to race. But he quoted a famous phrase from Dr. King’s address to reinforce a central theme of his own speech. “America, we cannot turn back,” Mr. Obama said. “Not with so much work to be done.”

Mr. McCain marked the occasion of the speech by releasing a television advertisement in which, looking into the camera, he paid tribute to Mr. Obama and his accomplishment. “How perfect that your nomination would come on this historic day,” Mr. McCain said. “Tomorrow, we’ll be back at it. But tonight, Senator, job well done.

The advertisement stood in stark contrast to a summer of slashing attacks on Mr. Obama by Mr. McCain that apparently contributed to the tightening of this race. And the softer tone did not last; Mr. Obama was still on the stage, watching the fireworks, when Mr. McCain’s campaign issued a statement attacking him.

“Tonight, Americans witnessed a misleading speech that was so fundamentally at odds with the meager record of Barack Obama,” said Tucker Bounds, a spokesman for Mr. McCain.

In his speech, Mr. Obama scored Mr. McCain for raising questions about his patriotism, and trying, he said, to turn a big election into a fight on small squabbles.

I love this country, and so do you, and so does John McCain,” Mr. Obama said, an American flag lapel affixed to his left lapel. “The men and women who serve in our battlefields may be Democrats and Republicans and Independents, but they have fought together and bled together and some died together under the same proud flag.”

“So I’ve got news for you, John McCain: We all put our country first,” he said, prompting the crowd to break into a chant of “U.S.A., U.S.A.”

Mr. Obama looked completely at ease and unintimidated by his task or the huge crowd that surrounded him. And he chastised Mr. McCain for trying to portray him as a celebrity, an attack aides say has been particularly damaging, offering a list of people who he said had inspired him, from his grandmother to an unemployed factory worker he met on the campaign trail.

“I don’t know what kind of lives John McCain thinks that celebrities lead, but this has been mine,” he said. “These are my heroes. Theirs are the stories that shaped me. And it is on behalf of them that I intend to win this election and keep our promise alive as president of the United States.”

Mr. Obama delivered his speech on a day of considerable political churn. Even as Mr. McCain was paying tribute to Mr. Obama on television, his aides disclosed that he made a choice for vice president and would announce it on Friday, timing intended to draw attention away from Mr. Obama on a day in which he and his running mate, Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., would be starting a joint campaign swing.

Mr. Obama’s audience began lining up to go through security and enter the stadium eight hours before he was to speak. As seats filled, they watched a series of musical performances, including by Stevie Wonder, who sang, “Signed, Sealed, Delivered I’m Yours.”

But the table for Mr. Obama was also set by speeches from some of the best-known Democratic leaders. They were led by Al Gore, the former vice president who confronted a question that has, fairly or not, hovered over Mr. Obama as he struggles in his contest with Mr. McCain.

“Why is this election so close?” Mr. Gore asked. “Well I know something about close elections, so let me offer you my opinion. I believe this election is close today mainly because the forces of the status quo are desperately afraid of the change Barack Obama represents.”

Mr. Obama used much of his speech to link Mr. McCain and Mr. Bush — a line of attack that his aides view as their strongest going into the fall — and signaled that he saw next week’s Republican convention, when Mr. McCain and Mr. Bush are to appear together, albeit briefly, as a way to press that line of attack.

“Next week, in Minnesota, the same party that brought you two terms of George Bush and Dick Cheney will ask this country for a third,” he said. “And we are here because we love this country too much to let the next four years look just like the last eight. On Nov. 4, we must stand up and say: ‘Eight is enough.’ ”

Speaking in generally broad terms, Mr. Obama offered a contrast between Republican and Democratic views of the role of government.

“We measure the strength of our economy not by the number of billionaires we have or the profits of the Fortune 500,” he said, “but by whether someone with a good idea can take a risk and start a business, or whether the waitress who lives on tips can take a day off to look after a sick kid without losing her job — an economy that honors the dignity of work.”

The outdoor acceptance speech was by any measure a risky gambit by a campaign that has shown a taste for taking chances and breaking with convention, as his aides acknowledged. Bad weather could have soaked the moment. Mr. Obama’s first question to aides when they proposed this was, “Will it rain?” It did not; the day was dry, if hot.

When John F. Kennedy held his outdoor rally at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum in June 1960, half the seats were empty, as a dispatch in The New York Times noted in dismissively describing the event as a “fresh air vaudeville.” The stadium here was packed by 5:15 mountain time, three hours before Mr. Obama was to take the stage, after a week in which Democrats and Obama supporters had been hustling for tickets.

Leave a comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Democratic National Convention, Election 2008, Joe Biden, ObamaBiden08

Biden’s Shadow Campaign

The media web is buzzing about Joe Biden for VP!

This from ABC NEWS:


Sen. Joe Biden, D-Delaware, has not been in the Presidential race
since just after the Iowa Caucus, where he finished 5th with 4 percent
of the vote.

While he hasn’t been a candidate for months, Biden has been on the
offensive against Sen. John McCain for several weeks, releasing
statements from his Senate press office attacking McCain’s platform.

Today, Biden zinged off a statement reacting to a report in the Grey Lady
that McCain agrees with President Bush’s expansive view of executive
authority, especially where it comes to the NSA warrantless wiretapping

“I said during the FISA debate in 1978 that “it is not necessary to
compromise civil liberties in the name of national security,” said
Biden in the statement. “That’s as true today, even in a time of war,
as it was then. We all share the goal of capturing the terrorists and
protecting national security and we can do that without violating the
privacy of the American people. Like President Bush, Sen. McCain is
presenting the American people with a false choice—national security or
civil liberties. We need a President who understands that we can have
both. It’s what our values and our Constitution demands.”

Biden was the only one of the many Senators who ran for President
this time around that was actually in the Senate in 1978 and he always
seemed a little frustrated that voters weren’t taking him more
seriously. He had more experience in the Senate than any of the other
candidates, Democrat or Republican, and his foreign policy chops are
evident – Biden chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

There have been a number of similar anti-McCain statements emanating
from Biden’s office in recent weeks and back in May when President Bush
seemed to take a swipe at Sen. Barack Obama during a speech at the
Knesset in Israel, Biden leapt up to cry foul and accuse President Bush
of a “disgraceful” “political hit.”

He told the Washington Times last week
that Sen. Barack Obama, who has since claimed the Democratic
Presidential nomination had asked him to play a more prominent” and
“deeply involved” role in Obama’s campaign.

All that from a guy that hasn’t even endorsed Obama yet. Yes, there
are still three Democratic Senators who have not officially endorsed a
Presidential candidate, although Biden is the only one who sought the
office himself this year.

The others are Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan and Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio.

It would only be a formality at this point anyway with Obama the
presumptive nominee and Biden already playing attack dog for him. and
it falls in line with something Biden said after returning to the
Senate after folding his own Presidential tent.

“I’ll endorse the next President,” he said then.

– Z. Byron Wolf

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Sen. Joe Biden: Dems Foreign Policy Man

From washingtonpost.com:

Tuesday, June 10, 2008;
Page A23

With economic distress so high, and with John McCain
claiming national security as his trump card, Democrats may again be
tempted to play down foreign affairs so they can turn the election into
a fight over domestic questions about which McCain has had little to

Evading national security, says Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.),
would be a disastrous mistake. “The only way we lose this election is
not to engage this issue head-on,” Biden said during an interview in
his Capitol office the day after Obama clinched the nomination.
Democrats, Biden said, should be “proactive” and not “play defense on
foreign affairs” because “the case against McCain and Bush on national
security is so overwhelming. . . . It should be an essential part of
the case for the Democratic nominee.”

I visited with Biden because he should be at the top of any list of
vice presidential picks for Obama. Why Biden? In part because of where
he took our discussion: Few Democrats know more about foreign policy,
and few would so relish the fight against McCain on international
affairs. Few are better placed to argue that withdrawal from Iraq will
strengthen rather than weaken the United States.

The worst thing in a running mate is the fear of muddying his or her image in political combat. Biden would be a happy warrior.

He was born in Scranton, Pa., an essential state for Democrats, and has been a regular in the Philadelphia media market. Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell,
himself a plausible No. 2, has called Biden “a perfect fit.” The
senator has been through two of his own presidential campaigns, in
which he experienced what an acquaintance of his called the “white-hot
heat” of scrutiny.

Biden is Catholic and hails from a blue-collar world, two constituencies with which Obama needs help. The chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and former chairman of the Judiciary Committee,
Biden speaks with real learning on international affairs and the
judiciary — the next vacancies on the Supreme Court should be a big
issue in this campaign — while never sounding like an elitist.

But the central reason to pick Biden is the message the choice would
send about Obama’s readiness to contest national security issues and
his understanding that fixing American foreign policy must be one of
the next president’s highest priorities.

Biden has been critical of Bush’s approach to Iraq and the world for
the right reasons, and from the beginning. In the fall of 2002, he
tried, with Republican Sens. Chuck Hagel and Richard Lugar,
to pass a more modest war resolution that put additional constraints on
Bush. Richard Gephardt, the House Democratic leader then,
short-circuited the effort by cutting a deal with the president. Even
before the war began, Biden was warning of the costs of a lengthy
occupation and predicting a decade-long intervention.

He is also frank about his misunderstanding of what Bush would do. At one point, he thought Bush was reluctant to start a war.

“I vastly underestimated the total incompetence of this crew,” he
says. “I could not fathom that they would do what they did under the
circumstances they did it.”

To restore its strength and influence, the United States needs to
return to the realistic internationalism of FDR, Truman and, yes, the
first President Bush. Whether or not Obama picks Biden, he should
listen to what Biden is saying. Obama can’t sidestep the foreign policy
debate. He has to win it.

Leave a comment

Filed under Barack Obama, Joe Biden, ObamaBiden08